Fundraise on MathsGee
First time here? Checkout the FAQs!
x

*Math Image Search only works best with zoomed in and well cropped math screenshots. Check DEMO

1 like 0 dislike
160 views
Find all solutions of \(5 x+\ln x=10000\), correct to 4 decimal places; use the Newton Method.
in Mathematics by Platinum (130,878 points) | 160 views

1 Answer

1 like 0 dislike
Best answer
Let \(f(x)=5 x+\ln x-10000\). We need to approximate the root(s) of the equation \(f(x)=0\). The function \(f\) is only defined for positive \(x\). Note that the function is steadily increasing, since \(f^{\prime}(x)=5+1 / x>0\) for all positive \(x\). It follows that the function can be 0 for at most one value of \(x\). It is easy to verify that \(f(1)<0\) and \(f(2000)>0\), and therefore the equation has a root in the interval \((1,2000)\).

The Newton Method iteration is easy to set up. We get
\[
x_{n+1}=x_{n}-\frac{5 x_{n}+\ln x_{n}-10000}{5+1 / x_{n}} .
\]
We could simplify the right hand side somewhat. This is probably not worthwhile.

Now we need to choose \(x_{0}\). The idea is that even when \(x\) is large, \(\ln x\) is by comparison quite small. So as a first approximation we can forget about the \(\ln x\) term, and decide that \(f(x)\) is approximately \(5 x-10000\). Thus the root of our original equation must be near \(x=2000\).

Shall we choose \(x_{0}=2000\) ? It is sensible to do so. But we can do better. Note that \(\ln (2000)\) is about 7.6. So we can take \(5 x_{0} \approx\) \(10000-7.6\). Let \(x_{0}=1998.48\).

A quick computation gives \(x_{1}=1998.479972\). This agrees with \(x_{0}\) to 4 decimal places, so the answer, correct to 4 decimal places, should be 1998.4800. If we feel like it, we can show by the usual "sign change" procedure that this answer is indeed correct to 4 places.

Note. If we start with \(x_{0}=2000\), it turns out that \(x_{1}=1998.479972\), so perhaps the extra thinking that went into starting with \(1998.48\) was unnecessary. But it illustrates the fact that in some cases we can get an extremely accurate estimate of a root without bringing out heavy machinery.
by Platinum (130,878 points)

Related questions

1 like 0 dislike
0 answers
1 like 0 dislike
1 answer
1 like 0 dislike
1 answer
3 like 0 dislike
1 answer

Join the MathsGee Learning Club where you get study and financial support for success from our community. CONNECT - LEARN - FUNDRAISE


On the MathsGee Learning Club, you can:


1. Ask questions


2. Answer questions


3. Vote on Questions and Answers


4. Start a Fundraiser


5. Tip your favourite community member(s)


6. Create Live Video Tutorials (Paid/Free)


7. Join Live Video Tutorials (Paid/Free)


8. Earn points for participating



Posting on the MathsGee Learning Club


1. Remember the human


2. Behave like you would in real life


3. Look for the original source of content


4. Search for duplicates before posting


5. Read the community's rules




CLUB RULES


1. Answers to questions will be posted immediately after moderation


2. Questions will be queued for posting immediately after moderation


3. Depending on how many posts we receive, you could be waiting up to 24 hours for your post to appear. But, please be patient as posts will appear after they pass our moderation.


MathsGee Android Q&A