Learning starts with a question. Asking is a signal for knowledge request!
First time here? Checkout the FAQs!
x

Math Image Search excels with single, zoomed-in, well-cropped math images (jpg/png); avoid selfies/diagrams; view demos for Math Image Search Demo and Ask a Question Using Text/Image Demo.

1 like 0 dislike
458 views
Find all solutions of \(5 x+\ln x=10000\), correct to 4 decimal places; use the Newton Method.
in Mathematics by Platinum (93,243 points) | 458 views

1 Answer

1 like 0 dislike
Best answer
Let \(f(x)=5 x+\ln x-10000\). We need to approximate the root(s) of the equation \(f(x)=0\). The function \(f\) is only defined for positive \(x\). Note that the function is steadily increasing, since \(f^{\prime}(x)=5+1 / x>0\) for all positive \(x\). It follows that the function can be 0 for at most one value of \(x\). It is easy to verify that \(f(1)<0\) and \(f(2000)>0\), and therefore the equation has a root in the interval \((1,2000)\).

The Newton Method iteration is easy to set up. We get
\[
x_{n+1}=x_{n}-\frac{5 x_{n}+\ln x_{n}-10000}{5+1 / x_{n}} .
\]
We could simplify the right hand side somewhat. This is probably not worthwhile.

Now we need to choose \(x_{0}\). The idea is that even when \(x\) is large, \(\ln x\) is by comparison quite small. So as a first approximation we can forget about the \(\ln x\) term, and decide that \(f(x)\) is approximately \(5 x-10000\). Thus the root of our original equation must be near \(x=2000\).

Shall we choose \(x_{0}=2000\) ? It is sensible to do so. But we can do better. Note that \(\ln (2000)\) is about 7.6. So we can take \(5 x_{0} \approx\) \(10000-7.6\). Let \(x_{0}=1998.48\).

A quick computation gives \(x_{1}=1998.479972\). This agrees with \(x_{0}\) to 4 decimal places, so the answer, correct to 4 decimal places, should be 1998.4800. If we feel like it, we can show by the usual "sign change" procedure that this answer is indeed correct to 4 places.

Note. If we start with \(x_{0}=2000\), it turns out that \(x_{1}=1998.479972\), so perhaps the extra thinking that went into starting with \(1998.48\) was unnecessary. But it illustrates the fact that in some cases we can get an extremely accurate estimate of a root without bringing out heavy machinery.
by Platinum (93,243 points)

Related questions

1 like 0 dislike
1 answer
1 like 0 dislike
0 answers
1 like 0 dislike
1 answer
1 like 0 dislike
1 answer
2 like 0 dislike
1 answer
1 like 0 dislike
1 answer
asked May 9, 2021 in Mathematics by Student Bronze Status (5,672 points) | 5,649 views
3 like 1 dislike
1 answer

Join MathsGee Questions & Answers, where you get instant answers to your questions from our AI, GaussTheBot and verified by human experts. We use a combination of generative AI and human experts to provide you the best solutions to your problems.

On the MathsGee Questions & Answers, you can:

1. Get instant answer to your questions

2. Convert image to latex

3. AI-generated answers and insights

4. Get expert-verified answers

5. Vote on questions and answers

6. Tip your favorite community members

7. Join expert live video sessions (Paid/Free)

8. Earn points by participating

9. Take a course

10. Enjoy our interactive learning resources


Posting on the MathsGee Questions & Answers

1. Remember the human

2. Act like you would in real life

3. Find original source of content

4. Check for duplicates before publishing

5. Read the community guidelines


MathsGee Questions & Answers Rules

1. Answers to questions will be posted immediately after moderation

2. Questions will be queued for posting immediately after moderation

3. Depending on the number of messages we receive, you could wait up to 24 hours for your message to appear. But be patient as posts will appear after passing our moderation.


MathsGee Questions & Answers

MathsGee Questions & Answers

MathJax.Hub.Config({ tex2jax: { inlineMath: [ ['$','$'], ["\\(","\\)"] ], config: ["MMLorHTML.js"], jax: ["input/TeX"], processEscapes: true } }); MathJax.Hub.Config({ "HTML-CSS": { linebreaks: { automatic: true } } });